rockafficiando Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Hi, I filed for PERM and have an approved I-140 from my previous firm(which is not cancelled). I currently work for a new employer, but I'm panning on transferring my H1 and going back to my previous firm next year. I was wondering if a new Labor/PERM and I-140 needs to done or can i continue with the old one. My location is still going to be the same. So, I'm thinking prevailing wages shouldn't change. I might go at a higher position than I was(kind of like a promotion) Please let me know Thanks Link to comment
pontevecchio Posted November 22, 2014 Report Share Posted November 22, 2014 Your company filed your PERM. Your approved I-140 stands unless the company revokes it. Link to comment
jairichi Posted November 22, 2014 Report Share Posted November 22, 2014 Your old PERM and I-140 are good. Link to comment
rockafficiando Posted November 24, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2014 Great thanks for the information just wanted to know one last thing. Does it matter if I go in as a another position than what was on my PERM and/or I-140 My PERM was filed for position '1234' and they are offering a bigger position called 'PQRS' I was wondering if i should take 'PQRS' or stick to my old '1234' under which my PERM was filed. Will help me decide on the paperwork of the offer details Please let me know Link to comment
ksribhas Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 same or similar rule still applies . If you are able to prove that pqrs is same or similar to 1234 at the time of 485, you should be good. Link to comment
pontevecchio Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 PERM is job specific. Link to comment
rockafficiando Posted December 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 Thanks for the replies folks...PQRS = 1234+ XYZ(additional responsibilities) as its up the corp ladder..So I'm good to go right? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.