mahabs Posted March 30, 2013 Report Share Posted March 30, 2013 Hi, I pleaded GUILTY to a C CLass MisDemeanor in 2005. The actual charge was a A class Misdemeanor of Poss of a gambling device which was reduced to acC Class MisDmnr. I pleaded guilty because my lawyer told me that C Class MisDemnr has no impact and is like a parking ticket. However I got this case opened again in 2011 and got all the charges dismissed and the record expunged in the state of TEXAS in 2012. Recently, Feb 20013 I got back ground checks(sent finger prints) done on myself by FBI, State Of Texas and State of Virginia(live here) and they all came back stating that NO ARREST RECORD was found. My question is since the BK checks came all Negative, can I say NO to the question on DS-160. By saying YES, am I not shooting myself in foot cause I have to explain to the visa officer what happened? The whole point of expungement was to avoid the embarrassing question/answer session that follow when you say you are arrested. Isn't it? Expungement legally means that a person can deny that they were ever arrested? Isn't it? Then why should I say that I was ever arrested when there is no record of it. I called up the state of texas DPS and FBI and they said the same thing, there are absolutely no records of any arrest. So my question is, why should I say YES in DS-160 when I am legally entitled to say NO every where else? Please advise. Thanks. Link to comment
test_litmus Posted March 31, 2013 Report Share Posted March 31, 2013 Its tricky here.Since you were fingerprinted and you were an allien,your case would hav been communicated to the DHS(offline) to validate if your presense in the country is legal,in which case DHS can possibly know your case. But the thing is class c misdemnor is punifhable by fine only in tx,hence this gives the relif email me we can discuss furthur on this. Link to comment
test_litmus Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 general saying is expungement does not work for immigration Link to comment
t75 Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 Expungement does not apply to immigration. Do not lie about it. You MUST say yes. Lie and be found out and you will face a possible lifetime ban. Link to comment
t75 Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 Furthermore, you should tell the truth because it is the morally right thing to do. Link to comment
Attorney_23 Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 This is actually very simple. Have you ever been arrested? I am assuming the answer is yes. Even if you were not actually arrested, you pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor. Either way, the answer to the question on the DS160 is clearly yes. Link to comment
ncheaib Posted December 13, 2013 Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 What did you end up answering and how did it go ? Link to comment
z1c5 Posted December 16, 2013 Report Share Posted December 16, 2013 Hi, I pleaded GUILTY to a C CLass MisDemeanor in 2005. The actual charge was a A class Misdemeanor of Poss of a gambling device which was reduced to acC Class MisDmnr. I pleaded guilty because my lawyer told me that C Class MisDemnr has no impact and is like a parking ticket. However I got this case opened again in 2011 and got all the charges dismissed and the record expunged in the state of TEXAS in 2012. Recently, Feb 20013 I got back ground checks(sent finger prints) done on myself by FBI, State Of Texas and State of Virginia(live here) and they all came back stating that NO ARREST RECORD was found. My question is since the BK checks came all Negative, can I say NO to the question on DS-160. By saying YES, am I not shooting myself in foot cause I have to explain to the visa officer what happened? The whole point of expungement was to avoid the embarrassing question/answer session that follow when you say you are arrested. Isn't it? Expungement legally means that a person can deny that they were ever arrested? Isn't it? Then why should I say that I was ever arrested when there is no record of it. I called up the state of texas DPS and FBI and they said the same thing, there are absolutely no records of any arrest. So my question is, why should I say YES in DS-160 when I am legally entitled to say NO every where else? Please advise. Thanks. So what did u end up doing? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.