OPT MOTION- UNLAWFULL PRESENCE


Simay

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, I came to the USA with an F1 student visa. Did my master's in the technology field, then applied for OPT. After 1 year of the initial OPT, before the expiration date, I applied for STEM OPT Extension. First received RFE, then Denial Notice. After talking with the school's DSO, I filed the motion and waiting for a decision. It has been 5 months since the initial OPT expiration date. Do I need to file the reinstatement at the same time or wait for the decision of the motion? Because after 6 months, I will be considered in unlawful presence.

Thank you in advance, 

Simay.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

While it is true that filing of a motion does not put the applicant back in status unless it is approved, F-1 students do not start accruing unlawful presence until either USCIS or an immigration judge makes a finding of status violation. Therefore, it is unlikely that you have been unlawfully present since the expiration of your first-year OPT. In addition, you should have also been eligible for the 60-day grace period after the end of your initial OPT period. Regardless, if you apply for reinstatement based on your admission to a new program of study, your STEM OPT can no longer be approved as you cannot pursue both OPT based on your previous program and starting a new program of study. The Murthy Law Firm attorneys can advise you on the best courses of action depending on your specific situation.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...