mfsipranavk Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Hi, My L1B Blanket visa got rejected in September, 2016. I received one 221(g) blue slip saying - "Work explained by me is not clearly approvable" . My company is filing L1B individual now. I had given my specialized skill in one of my company's proprietary tool. Now for L1B individual, should I give the same specialize skill tool again or should I change it ? Please suggest the best so that I could get my L1B individual petition approved. Thanks Link to comment
JoeF Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 So, your special skill is not needed at all? Sounds like fraud to me... Link to comment
pontevecchio Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Why is the company not using a lawyer? Link to comment
vincentanand Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 I would say that provide more detailed explanation to prove your specialized knowledge. L1B individual petitions are directly filed with USCIS and if approved you will get an approval notice ( I-797). Then you would have to take that I-797 and go to US consulate (in India?) to get stamping. As you have already approved I-797 notice , most probably you will get stamping. But in the case of L1B blanket, visa officer in consulate office will directly decide during the interview whether you have specialized knowledge or not. I would say that provide detailed and clear explaination proving your specialized knowledge. If you say some tool knowledge, can you prove that there are no resources in USA who knows how to use that tool?? You should provide all evidences that only you can work on that tool. Think on the 221g you received with L1B blanket and update the documentation with more detailed answers this time. Good luck. Link to comment
r.mahi11 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Depends... that may or may not be specialized Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.