chakrakr Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 Because "all of this is a grey area" (written gray in American English, btw.), telling people things are going to be fine is a bad thing to do. Telling people to avoid all the gray areas by not using stuff like "BS+5 or MS+2" is a good thing. Make things easy and clear and according to the rules, and there aren't many problems. Try to skirt the rules, and problems are likely. Just because it is "gray" for you or I does not mean it is grey for everybody. Lawyers know what they are doing . They know how to read the laws and regulations. So when lawyers write BS+5 or MS+2, you have no right to oppose it when the law does not support your opinion. You have been telling from time immemorial BS+5 or MS+2 can never be EB2 which is plain wrong. Nobody is skirting the rules -- we are showing you what the rule is. If you have learnt something, ackowledge it and move ahead. Link to comment
ateetshah Posted August 21, 2013 Report Share Posted August 21, 2013 Because "all of this is a grey area" (written gray in American English, btw.), telling people things are going to be fine is a bad thing to do. Telling people to avoid all the gray areas by not using stuff like "BS+5 or MS+2" is a good thing. Make things easy and clear and according to the rules, and there aren't many problems. Try to skirt the rules, and problems are likely. BS + 5 or Ms + 2 = EB2 PERIOD. Go talk to USCIS and prove it's wrong. Link to comment
ateetshah Posted August 21, 2013 Report Share Posted August 21, 2013 Because "all of this is a grey area" (written gray in American English, btw.), telling people things are going to be fine is a bad thing to do. Telling people to avoid all the gray areas by not using stuff like "BS+5 or MS+2" is a good thing. Make things easy and clear and according to the rules, and there aren't many problems. Try to skirt the rules, and problems are likely. I think if you admit and concur to opinions of people without being combative and condescending, it's better. All opinions are welcome, but people here are much more smarter than you think. Remember the fact that law is created equal for all, but there will always be issue. We don't live in utopia or a perfect world. Link to comment
dream16 Posted September 3, 2013 Report Share Posted September 3, 2013 Question of the day: I have BS (American) + 4 years of work experience after BS excluding the current employer + MBA (American) ===> now tell me my eb2 permutations :) :) Link to comment
JoeF Posted September 3, 2013 Report Share Posted September 3, 2013 Question of the day: I have BS (American) + 4 years of work experience after BS excluding the current employer + MBA (American) ===> now tell me my eb2 permutations :) :) The job requirements decide. Link to comment
rahul412 Posted September 3, 2013 Report Share Posted September 3, 2013 Question of the day: I have BS (American) + 4 years of work experience after BS excluding the current employer + MBA (American) ===> now tell me my eb2 permutations :) :) tell us about that 'EB2' job requirements Link to comment
ateetshah Posted September 4, 2013 Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 tell us about that 'EB2' job requirements EB2 - all of these require the beneficiary to have US Equivalent degree and appropriate experience at time of filing. Assuming that below Ph.D + X Ph.D or Masters + X Masters + X or BS + >5 years Bachelors + >5 standalone with any higher degree combination as above. EB3 Bachelors <5 years with any combination of Ph.D or Masters. Doesn't matter. Link to comment
rahul412 Posted September 4, 2013 Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 EB2 - all of these require the beneficiary to have US Equivalent degree and appropriate experience at time of filing. Assuming that below Ph.D + X Ph.D or Masters + X Masters + X or BS + >5 years Bachelors + >5 standalone with any higher degree combination as above. EB3 Bachelors <5 years with any combination of Ph.D or Masters. Doesn't matter. wow.. I know about that. I myself waiting for GC under EB2. My question to that person was 'what are the min job requirements for that job which he was thinking that may fall under EB2 category?' Link to comment
dream16 Posted September 17, 2013 Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 tell us about that 'EB2' job requirements It is BS + 5 year or Masters Link to comment
rahul412 Posted September 17, 2013 Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 It is BS + 5 year or Masters If they mentioned 'masters' then you are eligible for EB2. Link to comment
xfitter Posted September 17, 2013 Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 I know of a recent EB2 case where PERM was denied, and that was due to mentioning Masters or Bachelors+4 years.The rejection notice mentioned clearly that the job experience requirement for the position is inconsistent, that Masters is not equivalent to Bachelors+4 years. So, this may mean MS +2 years of experience is not equivalent to Bachelor's + 5 years. The beneficiary in this case had Masters and about 12 years experience. This does not mean everyone may face rejection/problems, but if you are out of luck, you do not know what DOL/USCIS picks on. I had another friend (EB2) who printed copies of advertisement that ran to two pages, and was under audit/RFE for two years. They asked for documentation to prove that page 2 is a continuation of page 1. Link to comment
JoeF Posted September 17, 2013 Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 If they mentioned 'masters' then you are eligible for EB2. Wrong. The minimum requirement counts. If it lists MS or BS+4, then BS+4 would count, and that makes it EB3. That, btw, is also why "MS+2 or BS+5" would not be EB2. Link to comment
rahul412 Posted September 18, 2013 Report Share Posted September 18, 2013 Wrong. The minimum requirement counts. If it lists MS or BS+4, then BS+4 would count, and that makes it EB3. That, btw, is also why "MS+2 or BS+5" would not be EB2. Got it. Link to comment
dream16 Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 I know of a recent EB2 case where PERM was denied, and that was due to mentioning Masters or Bachelors+4 years.The rejection notice mentioned clearly that the job experience requirement for the position is inconsistent, that Masters is not equivalent to Bachelors+4 years. So, this may mean MS +2 years of experience is not equivalent to Bachelor's + 5 years. The beneficiary in this case had Masters and about 12 years experience. This does not mean everyone may face rejection/problems, but if you are out of luck, you do not know what DOL/USCIS picks on. I had another friend (EB2) who printed copies of advertisement that ran to two pages, and was under audit/RFE for two years. They asked for documentation to prove that page 2 is a continuation of page 1. What it means is BS + 5 years = Masters + 0 years Link to comment
dream16 Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 I know of a recent EB2 case where PERM was denied, and that was due to mentioning Masters or Bachelors+4 years.The rejection notice mentioned clearly that the job experience requirement for the position is inconsistent, that Masters is not equivalent to Bachelors+4 years. So, this may mean MS +2 years of experience is not equivalent to Bachelor's + 5 years. The beneficiary in this case had Masters and about 12 years experience. This does not mean everyone may face rejection/problems, but if you are out of luck, you do not know what DOL/USCIS picks on. I had another friend (EB2) who printed copies of advertisement that ran to two pages, and was under audit/RFE for two years. They asked for documentation to prove that page 2 is a continuation of page 1. The reason for rejection was that min req was mentioned wrong in this case. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.