itsmo Posted April 22, 2011 Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 I received receipt notices, approvals and EAD cards for our recent joint application of I-131, I-765 and I-485 in Nov 2010 while working for Company B with 09/2009 as PD. I requested porting of PD from my previous approved I-140 with PD 12/2005 through Company A while applying for Company B's I-140 petition, but I received B's approval with 09/2009 and A# numbers were matching. Based on Visa bulletin we went ahead with I-131, I-765 & I-485 application and re-requesting the PD porting, and in 02/2011 we received our AP/EAD combo cards approved. I'm trying to figure out if this means priority date is ported or do I need to anything more on that part. Is there a way I can double check with USCIS customer service on this? I'm sitting so close with visa dates, this porting is very important for approvals. Forum your comments and suggestions would be a great help. Thanks in advance! Link to comment
pontevecchio Posted April 22, 2011 Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 YES. Get an INFOPASS Appointment if you want or call your Lawyer. Link to comment
itsmo Posted May 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2011 485 is denied citing this reason from USCIS "USCIS records indicate that petition was revoked on May 17, 2007, based on a request of petitioner for withdrawal. As such, the retention of that previously accorded priority date is not possible" Is this something that can be defended with MTR? I have seen other similar porting cases went through without issues. Link to comment
Alexandre Posted May 4, 2011 Report Share Posted May 4, 2011 Probably yes, because if you are not current on your PD you cannot apply I 485, and based on your case they accept your I 485 and process EAD / AP based on pending I 485 petition. If the A# matching you gonna received a RFE asking to do a letter with your hand asking to porting the priority dates from previous company to a new I 140 petition. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.