Attorney_22 Posted August 6, 2020 Report Share Posted August 6, 2020 This week, Murthy Law Firm attorneys will answer questions regarding the injunction of the public charge rule. Rules for Topic of the Week Threads: 1. Attorney's postings contain general information only and are not a substitute for case-specific legal advice. 2. The attorney will answer only those questions which relate to the main subject. If you have a question on some other issue, please start a new thread in the appropriate forum section. 3. The attorney will not necessarily answer every question posted and may provide a single answer to a group of similar questions. 4. Please do not provide information which would identify any specific company, university or individual. Link to comment Share on other sites
newacct Posted August 7, 2020 Report Share Posted August 7, 2020 Does the 2nd Circuit decision limiting a previous injunction to New York, Connecticut, and Vermont, affect the latest injunction? Link to comment Share on other sites
newacct Posted August 7, 2020 Report Share Posted August 7, 2020 USCIS says that I-485 postmarked after July 29 and while the injunction is in effect should not include I-944, and I-539 and I-129 postmarked after July 29 and while the injunction is in effect should not include the public benefits information: Quote Applicants and petitioners whose applications or petitions are postmarked on or after July 29, 2020, should not include the Form I-944 or provide information about the receipt of public benefits on Form I-485, Form I-129, Form I-129CW, Form I-539, or Form I-539A. If the injunction is later reversed, will USCIS issue RFEs to provide the I-944 or public benefits information for people who filed applications during this time? Link to comment Share on other sites
Attorney_22 Posted August 13, 2020 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2020 On 8/7/2020 at 1:41 PM, newacct said: Does the 2nd Circuit decision limiting a previous injunction to New York, Connecticut, and Vermont, affect the latest injunction? Yes, the injunction appears to be limited to NY, CT and VT at this time. Link to comment Share on other sites
Attorney_22 Posted August 13, 2020 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2020 On 8/7/2020 at 1:46 PM, newacct said: USCIS says that I-485 postmarked after July 29 and while the injunction is in effect should not include I-944, and I-539 and I-129 postmarked after July 29 and while the injunction is in effect should not include the public benefits information: If the injunction is later reversed, will USCIS issue RFEs to provide the I-944 or public benefits information for people who filed applications during this time? It is unlikely they will, however, we cannot be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites
Narayanan S Posted October 9, 2020 Report Share Posted October 9, 2020 I am filing for AOS based on an approved I-140, under Alien Worker (H1B). My wife and child are applying with me. They are in H4 status. Do I need to submit I-864 for them? Link to comment Share on other sites
10451 Mill Run Circle, Suite 100
Recommended Posts