IronHorse 0 Report post Posted December 18, 2018 I received a I485 RFE even when my PD wasn't current and neither of signs to be current soon. My 485 has been pending from last 6 years. Also, I haven't changed my employer. The only issue was that my client contract was over before I received the RFE. My employer refused to give me Supplement J form and this he informed me when the due date for RFE submission was just 10 days away. I quickly approached an Attorney firm and they said that they can reply to the RFE to get further extension as I wasn't employed. I am worried if USCIS would extend the RFE time limit. Also, the Attorney attached my linkedin profile and some emails showing that I was job-searching. I really want to know the following: 1) Is this the right way to address this RFE? 2) What might be the reason for this RFE in first place? Any response would be helpful. Please reply! Appreciate your help! Thanks Share this post Link to post
pontevecchio 12 Report post Posted December 18, 2018 What was the RFE about? Share this post Link to post
IronHorse 0 Report post Posted December 27, 2018 The RFE was for Supplement J, I-693 medical report, Evidence of authorization and G325A Share this post Link to post
nike.yo 0 Report post Posted February 20, 2019 (edited) @IronHorse - can you please share your experience of how you responded back to RFE? Edited February 20, 2019 by nike.yo Share this post Link to post
Desi Dude 0 Report post Posted March 8, 2019 Sorry to hear about your case. It's a torture to ask for evidence after 6 years of pending I-485. First they make you wait for decades and then they ask for new proofs later. Things change in 10yrs, life changes. This is double discrimination. None of the other nationalities have to go through this. Share this post Link to post
Provence 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2019 The delay in processing and the wait times have nothing to do with nationalities. Nor is it discrimination. Share this post Link to post
Desi Dude 0 Report post Posted March 11, 2019 How is it not discrimination? Someone born in Bangladesh can get GC within 2 yrs. Someone born in Guatemala can get GC within 2 yrs. Someone born in Nigeria can get GC within 2 yrs. Someone born in Estonia can get GC within 2 yrs. But if you are born in India by no plan of yours, you gotta wait decades to get your GC, in the peak of your life when you should be focusing on career & family. Just coz of where you were born. This is the exact definition of discrimination based on nationality. Applying country quota to legal immigrants is a joke when you allow 20 million illegal immigrants from just one country. It's meaningless. Indian population in US is just 3.5%. How is it ok to limit people from India who come legally? Share this post Link to post
Provence 0 Report post Posted March 12, 2019 If the Indian nationals you quote don't like the wait, no one is forcing them to be in the US. They're free to focus on their career and family while in India. They have India work authorization and India passports. India has a growing economy from what I hear. No one, absolutely no one is forced to be in the US. They stay by choice. They don't like the wait, they can leave. Share this post Link to post
JoeF 7 Report post Posted March 12, 2019 (edited) The law does not discriminate. Every country has a quota of GCs. It is not the US fault that so many people from India want to come here. You are always free to work in your home country. Edited March 12, 2019 by JoeF Share this post Link to post
Desi Dude 0 Report post Posted March 12, 2019 That might be true for new people coming in. But doesn't apply to people who came 15yrs back, they were not told that it will take 20yrs, so go back now. Those people are stuck, only coz they followed all the rules. By the way, Ive seen yours & JoeF's comments on illegal immigration, you guys support it. I have never seen you saying that they should go back. Share this post Link to post