Jump to content
All posts are moderated, so it will take time for your post to appear!
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

1 Follower

About catx

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

9,597 profile views
  1. catx

    Immigration Reform

    Respectfully, if you are in the U.S. you should learn your civics lessons. Executive action means what it says -- action by the executive branch of the U.S. federal government, and the executive branch is the president and his administration. (For reference, the legislative branch is Congress, and the judicial branch are the federal courts with the Supreme Court at the top.) When President Obama said "he would go it alone" referring to immigration reform, he was saying he would use his authority to issue executive actions to address immigration reform. That being said, presidential executive action is limited in what can be done. For example, presidential executive action cannot change immigration quotas specified in the immigration act. In other words, executive action cannot change or make laws. Only Congress can change or make laws through passing legislation.
  2. catx

    Immigration Reform

    The daily news is full of the reasons, in increasing impact ... Russia's aggressions against Ukraine, and the associated hostilities. ISIS / ISIL in Syria and Iraq, and the brutalities and unspeakable atrocities exacted upon two American journalists and other civilians in their occupied territories. The NATO summit this week, in which the above noted foreign affairs issues are front and center. The influx of unaccompanied minors and mothers from Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras at the U.S. southern border (so-called "humanitarian crisis"). Potential impact on the November 2014 mid-term elections. It is this last point that is particularly noteworthy. There is marked, if not significant, pressure within the Democratic party to delay any executive actions on immigration until after the November mid-term elections for fear of loosing vulnerable Senate seats to the Republicans, and thus loosing majority control in the Senate. If the Republicans win majority control in the Senate in November, and therefore would have the majority in both houses of Congress, then President Obama would have no legislative agenda (except to veto bills). Further, for those groups pressuring for executive action for illegal aliens, be careful what you wish for it may just come true. If President Obama issues executive actions for illegal aliens benefits, then there will be a Republican backlash. This could easily carry Republicans into majority control in the Senate. If this happens, one of the first bills to be passed by Congress would be to rescind those executive actions including DACA, and impose additional actions and penalties on all illegal aliens.
  3. If you find yourself in the situation where ... (1) an extension H visa petition was filed prior to your H visa expiration date, (2) your H visa has expired, and thus your driver license expired on the same date, and (3) your extension H visa has not yet been approved / the petition is still pending, then ... (I) You are in a 240 day period of authorized stay beyond your H visa expiration date, (II) you can get a driver license renewal for the 8 months, and (III) the driver license is a state (e.g. Texas DPS) matter, and calling the USCIS is of no use (e.g. there are no dates to correct). @jagankkirsh (and others), you will receive 1 or 2 letters from the Texas DPS. The first one maybe that the Texas DPS is submitting a request to the DHS to verify your status and you will hear back in 20 days. The important letter is that the Texas DPS has heard back from the DHS. After you receive this letter, you can go back down to the Texas DPS office with your USCIS receipt for your extension H visa petition, your expired H visa, passport, and expired driver license (and other immigration documents), and request a 8 month driver license renewal. You will still have to pay the full 6 year $25 fee. When your extension H visa is approved and you receive your new H visa, you can go back down to the Texas DPS office and get another driver license renewal to your new H visa expiration date (e.g. for 3 years). Again it will be the full 6 year $25 fee.
  4. catx

    Immigration Reform

    You need to do some more research on the administrative fixes to legal employment based immigration that are being contemplated for executive action before making such as statement. There is reporting through the AILA that Mr. Oppenheim, Chief of the Visa Control and Reporting Division at the Department of State, said that visa number recapture from previous years and having spouses and children dependent derivative visas not counted in the employment based (EB) category quotas would result in all of the EB visa categories immediately becoming current. This specifically applies to "current EB2 and EB3 people", including those "who have been waiting in line for more than 5 years". As for H-4 spouse employment authorization, it is a DHS / USCIS rule making proposal and process that has been ongoing for 2-1/2 years, outside of the any Administration executive action immigration 'fixes'. It will complete in the next few months regardless of President Obama, the Administration executive actions, the mid term elections. (Albeit, President Obama may 'role it into' his immigration 'fixes' to take credit for the action.)
  5. catx

    Immigration Reform

    That is hardly the sole purview of the Democrats -- the same thing can be said of the Republicans. When it comes to politics the age old "golden rule" applies ... "he who has the gold makes the rules". Also, why are you complaining? Recent news articles are suggesting that President Obama and the Administration are listening to business groups who are lobbying for (executive action) immigration fixes for legal aliens pursuing employment based permanent residency visas (green cards). Notably, the fixes being sought and contemplated are visa number recapture from previous years (estimated at 200,000 visas) and having spouses and children dependent derivative visas not counted in the employment based (EB) category quotas (estimated at ~80,000 visas / year). At the same time pressure is growing to limit and even defer administrative (executive action) 'fixes' (benefits) for illegal aliens because of the risk of losing control in the Senate. In other words, reasonable changes (fixes) for legal aliens is gaining favor, and 'fixes' (benefits) for illegal aliens is losing some momentum.
  6. catx

    Immigration Reform

    With respect to executive orders and immigration, from numerous sources it appears that President Obama is going to use the latitude availed him under proprietorial discretion to expand deferred action and employment authorization to certain groups of illegal (so-called undocumented) aliens, such as parents of U.S. citizen children and parents of DACA children. Unfortunately, and very regrettably, it does not appear that President Obama is going to anything to help legal aliens. While admittedly his options in this respect are more limited, there are constitutional scholars that submit he could tweak how the USCIS is interpreting and implementing the immigration act. One example is the USCIS application of "automatic" retention of a priority date for aged-out children under the CSPA. The administration through the Department of Justice took their case for a very narrow interpretation of the law all the way to the Supreme Court and won. In the ruling the Supreme Court did give the administration 'wiggle room' to change its interpretation to benefit all children who have aged-out. This could be an executive action benefiting some legal aliens. However, I have no expectation that is going to happen. (With respect to the Supreme Court challenge in the first place, shame on President Obama for aggressively denying immigration benefits to legal aliens while looking for ways to expand benefits for illegal aliens. Clearly President Obama's immigration actions are politically motivated to secure a voting block for Democrats. I used to believe President Obama leaned toward doing the right thing, not just the political thing, and his immigration actions would be a "tide that floated all boats", but that is looking less and less likely, and correspondingly he is more and more losing my support.) Regarding any broader executive actions, such as taking elements or otherwise leaning on elements of S. 744, those are not constitutionally legal options.
  7. JoeF I stand corrected, thank you. Regardless, I am transitioning off this forum as all I see is the same questions, issues, immigration abuses, etc. time after time with no end, and I am weary of the 'Don Quixote' effect. Time to move on and focus my time reading information from authoritative sources, and energies helping my son with his immigration status and getting his permanent residency.
  8. catx

    OPT STEM 17 months extension - RFE received

    The RFE would seem to be about providing evidence (documentation) that you were legitimately employed during the period in question, and did not exceed the 90 day unemployment limit while on OPT employment authorization. The documentation you outlined would seem sufficient evidence. However, as this is a public Internet forum, the best advise would be for you to review the RFE and your documentation with your employer's lawyer, who should be able and willing to help you. As for the second employment with an E-verified company, yes, the government has records that you were employed through the E-verify system. The information is that you were employed, but not the employment details such as salary. The USCIS will not have information from the IRS regarding your 1099.
  9. catx

    SSN with CPT

    CPT employment authorization by itself does not allow you to apply for a Social Security Number (SSN). You also need to have the job offer from the employer who is associated / affiliated with the university course that is the basis for the CPT employment authorization to apply for and receive a SSN. If you are using CPT employment authorization to work at an arbitrary job, then that is immigration abuse if not outright immigration fraud.
  10. You are correct, the answer to question 3(a) is No. The answer to question 3(b) is also No, as an I-140 petition is not an immigration petition. An immigration petition would be an I-485 adjustment of status application, which would be filed when the applicable priority date becomes current.
  11. My children attended university, starting on a H-4 visa, while I was waiting for my priority date to become current (even before we could file an I-485 adjustment of status application), and because of their time living in the state, graduating from high school in the state, they were eligible and received in-state tuition. The most important point to note is that the in-state tuition rules are per state, and vary from state to state. As for financial aid, federal assistance is only available for citizens and permanent residents. (It is not available while an I-485 adjustment of status application is in process / pending.) Some states have limited financial aid, scholarships, etc. for legal aliens through the university / college -- but it is usually not much, if any. Your only option is to check with the university / college financial aid office. Other than federal financial aid, the rules for tuition, assistance, etc. are per state and vary.
  12. The Texas DPS will only renew a non citizen's driver license if and when they clear legal immigration status verification by the DHS through the SAFE system.
  13. Nureya, you realize you are counseling committing immigration fraud, and what you suggest is grounds for deportation and an entry ban. Any school that provides an I-20 for a "dummy course" is also committing flagrant immigration fraud. Clearly you have little or no respect for the U.S. and are more than willing to break the law and recommend that others do so as well.
  14. catx

    Confused : Full time vs Consulting

    First caution is the expression "the grass is greener on the other side of the fence", which means the potential opportunity may look good from where you are, but can turn out to be not so good when you get there and see things first hand. Further, in my opinion, there are a number of caution 'flags' with the consulting company ... no medical, no 401K, no paid vacation time, and probably most telling -- saying they will use a leave of absence for vacation time and especially for bench time. This use of leave of absence is a violation of the H-1B immigration laws, regulations, and rules, fraudulent, and illegal. This is treating 'employees' (if you can call them that) as disposable at best. Personally, I would not take a position with such a consulting company, especially when you are working for a supportive employer as a full-time employee.
  15. You have to do it promptly. While that may not be immediately, it is in the order of days -- not weeks, and especially not months.